Congress and the Constitution (e-bok)
Format
E-bok
Filformat
PDF med Adobe-kryptering
Om Adobe-kryptering
PDF-böcker lämpar sig inte för läsning på små skärmar, t ex mobiler.
Nedladdning
Kan laddas ned under 24 månader, dock max 6 gånger.
Språk
Engelska
Antal sidor
331
Utgivningsdatum
2005-07-18
Förlag
Duke University Press
ISBN
9780822387114
Congress and the Constitution (e-bok)

Congress and the Constitution E-bok

E-bok (PDF - DRM), Engelska, 2005-07-18
432

Just nu 12% rabatt på allt! Använd kod JUNI6

Handla för minst 299 kr, t.o.m. 7 juni. Villkor

Läs i Adobe DRM-kompatibel e-boksläsare. Tips på appar
Finns även som
  • Skickas inom 11-20 vardagar (specialorder)
    1270
  • Skickas inom 3-6 vardagar
    446
Visa alla 2 format & utgåvor
For more than a decade, the U.S. Supreme Court has turned a skeptical eye toward Congress. Distrustful of Congress's capacity to respect constitutional boundaries, the Court has recently overturned federal legislation at a historically unprecedented rate. This intensified judicial scrutiny highlights the need for increased attention to how Congress approaches constitutional issues. In this important collection, leading scholars in law and political science examine the role of Congress in constitutional interpretation, demonstrating how to better integrate the legislative branch into understandings of constitutional practice.Several contributors offer wide-ranging accounts of the workings of Congress. They look at lawmakers' attitudes toward Congress's role as a constitutional interpreter, the offices within Congress that help lawmakers learn about constitutional issues, Congress's willingness to use its confirmation power to shape constitutional decisions by both the executive and the courts, and the frequency with which congressional committees take constitutional questions into account. Other contributors address congressional deliberation, paying particular attention to whether Congress's constitutional interpretations are sound. Still others examine how Congress and the courts should respond to one another's decisions, suggesting how the courts should evaluate Congress's work and considering how lawmakers respond to Court decisions that strike down federal legislation. While some essayists are inclined to evaluate Congress's constitutional interpretation positively, others argue that it could be improved and suggest institutional and procedural reforms toward that end. Whatever their conclusions, all of the essays underscore the pervasive and crucial role that Congress plays in shaping the meaning of the Constitution.Contributors. David P. Currie, Neal Devins, William N. Eskridge Jr.. John Ferejohn, Louis Fisher, Elizabeth Garrett, Michael J. Gerhardt, Michael J. Klarman, Bruce G. Peabody, J. Mitchell Pickerill, Barbara Sinclair, Mark Tushnet, Adrian Vermeule, Keith E. Whittington, John C. Yoo
Visa hela texten

Kundrecensioner

Har du läst boken? Sätt ditt betyg »