Neal Devins - Böcker

The Company They Keep advances a new way of thinking about Supreme Court decision-making. In so doing, it explains why today's Supreme Court is the first ever in which lines of ideological division are also partisan lines between justices appointe...

Läs mer »

Are Supreme Court justices swayed by the political environment that surrounds them? Most people think "e;yes,"e; and they point to the influence of the general public and the other branches of government on the Court. It is not that simple...

Läs mer »

Are Supreme Court justices swayed by the political environment that surrounds them? Most people think "e;yes,"e; and they point to the influence of the general public and the other branches of government on the Court. It is not that simple...

Läs mer »

Constitutional law is clearly shaped by judicial actors. But who else contributes? Scholars in the past have recognized that the legislative branch plays a significant role in determining structural issues, such as separation of powers and federal...

Läs mer »

Constitutional law is clearly shaped by judicial actors. But who else contributes? Scholars in the past have recognized that the legislative branch plays a significant role in determining structural issues, such as separation of powers and federal...

Läs mer »

This book brings together essays from a distinguished group of scholars, presenting an array of views about the meaning of equality and providing perspectives on the on-going debates about it. By bringing together essays from prominent writers in ...

Läs mer »

This book brings together essays from a distinguished group of scholars, presenting an array of views about the meaning of equality and providing perspectives on the on-going debates about it. By bringing together essays from prominent writers in ...

Läs mer »

Constitutional law is clearly shaped by judicial actors. But who else contributes? Scholars in the past have recognized that the legislative branch plays a significant role in determining structural issues, such as separation of powers and federal...

Läs mer »

The idea of equality is central to American civic life and one of the foundations of our national identity. Charges of unequal treatment continue to be voiced nationwide, in both the public discourse and the courts, yet there is no consensus on th...

Läs mer »

Constitutional law is clearly shaped by judicial actors. But who else contributes? Scholars in the past have recognized that the legislative branch plays a significant role in determining structural issues, such as separation of powers and federal...

Läs mer »

This fascinating debunking of judicial supremacy argues that nonjudicial contributions to constitutional interpretation make the Constitution more stable, more consistent with constitutional principles, and more protective of individual and minori...

Läs mer »

First published in 1995. Routledge is an imprint of Taylor & Francis, an informa company.

Läs mer »

On January 22, 1973, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Roe v. Wade. Holding that a womans substantive due process right to terminate her pregnancy in the early months outweighed state interests in maternal health and fetal protection, the C...

Läs mer »

The United States Supreme Courts 200203 term confounded Court watchers. The same Rehnquist Court that many had seen as solidly conservative and unduly activistthe Court that helped decide the 2000 presidential election and struck down thirty-one f...

Läs mer »

The United States Supreme Courts 200203 term confounded Court watchers. The same Rehnquist Court that many had seen as solidly conservative and unduly activistthe Court that helped decide the 2000 presidential election and struck down thirty-one f...

Läs mer »

For more than a decade, the U.S. Supreme Court has turned a skeptical eye toward Congress. Distrustful of Congresss capacity to respect constitutional boundaries, the Court has recently overturned federal legislation at a historically unprecedente...

Läs mer »

For more than a decade, the U.S. Supreme Court has turned a skeptical eye toward Congress. Distrustful of Congresss capacity to respect constitutional boundaries, the Court has recently overturned federal legislation at a historically unprecedente...

Läs mer »

Modern ideas about the protection of free speech in the United States did not originate in twentieth-century Supreme Court cases, as many have thought. Free Speech, "e;The People's Darling Privilege"e; refutes this misconception by examini...

Läs mer »

Despite its importance to the life of the nation and all its citizens, the Supreme Court remains a mystery to most Americans, its workings widely felt but rarely seen firsthand. In this book, journalists who cover the Court-acting as the eyes and ...

Läs mer »

In Only One Place of Redress David E. Bernstein offers a bold reinterpretation of American legal history: he argues that American labor and occupational laws, enacted by state and federal governments after the Civil War and into the twentieth cent...

Läs mer »

Can the death penalty be administered in a just way-without executing the innocent, without regard to race, and without arbitrariness? How does capital punishment in the United States fit with international human rights law? These are among the qu...

Läs mer »

"e;A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."e;-Amendment II, United States ConstitutionThe Second Amendment is regularly invoked by op...

Läs mer »

Although the federal appointment of U.S. judges and executive branch officers has consistently engendered controversy, previous studies of the process have been limited to particular dramatic conflicts and have tended to view appointments in a vac...

Läs mer »

In Constitutional Deliberation in Congress J. Mitchell Pickerill analyzes the impact of the Supreme Court's constitutional decisions on Congressional debates and statutory language. Based on a thorough examination of how Congress responds to key C...

Läs mer »

The United States Supreme Court's 2002-03 term confounded Court watchers. The same Rehnquist Court that many had seen as solidly conservative and unduly activist-the Court that helped decide the 2000 presidential election and struck down thirty-on...

Läs mer »

Perhaps more than any other Supreme Court ruling, Brown v. Board of Education, the 1954 decision declaring the segregation of public schools unconstitutional, highlighted both the possibilities and the limitations of American democracy. This colle...

Läs mer »

Most recent discussion of the United States Constitution and war-both the war on terrorism and the war in Iraq-has been dominated by two diametrically opposed views: the alarmism of those who see many current policies as portending gross restricti...

Läs mer »

For more than a decade, the U.S. Supreme Court has turned a skeptical eye toward Congress. Distrustful of Congress's capacity to respect constitutional boundaries, the Court has recently overturned federal legislation at a historically unprecedent...

Läs mer »

On January 22, 1973, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Roe v. Wade. Holding that a woman's substantive due process right to terminate her pregnancy in the early months outweighed state interests in maternal health and fetal protection, the ...

Läs mer »

On January 22, 1973, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Roe v. Wade. Holding that a woman's substantive due process right to terminate her pregnancy in the early months outweighed state interests in maternal health and fetal protection, the ...

Läs mer »